Stop With The Slop

Recently my colleague Toli included this disclaimer in an RFC:
š¤ Iāve written this RFC with the help of ChatGPT for wording (hopefully easier for you to read!), but Iāve read it all, and they are intentional design decisions. If you do see anything thatās off, add a comment.
I felt relief and appreciation: āHow thoughtful of him to put me at ease like that. Maybe we should all do that?ā
See, the problem isnāt that I wasnāt expecting a thoughtful, relevant RFC actually worth reviewing ā especially coming from this author.
But Iāve felt recently that the amount of AI-generated slop everywhere is so high that I constantly have a background process running in my brain that is trying to detect it. And the more often the process raises an alert when Iām one-third into some text (āHey, wait a minute, this is AI-generated slop, Iāve just wasted so much time and attentionā¦ā), the more difficult it is to suspend that background process ā which is very heavy on my resources.
Incidentally, today I stumbled upon this post:
https://www.seangoedecke.com/dont-feed-me-slop/
which made me realize that Iām not alone.
So it seems like the main thing may not be the revealing that AI was used: āIāve written this RFC with the help of ChatGPTā, but the second part:ābut Iāve read it all, and they are intentional design decisionsā.
The post also let me give a name to that feeling when the scales tip: āthe unpleasant uncanny-valley sensation when you realise youāre not talking to a humanā.
P.S. I didnāt use AI when writing this post, but I deliberately used em dashes for punctuation above, to trigger your AI-detection background process. The cover image was not AI-generated: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rexroof/3267476203



